Ehrman In A Sentence

We found 388 'Ehrman' sentence examples to help you understand how to use Ehrman in a sentence.

• For instance, the NT has textual AGREEMENTS much more than Ehrman wants to discuss.
• There's a Q and A in the back that is enlightening because it probes Ehrman's personal beliefs.
• I cannot determine if Ehrman is accurate or not.
• PROFESSOR Ehrman DOES SUPERB WORK IN WRITING ON THE HISTORY OF THE NEW TESTMANET ERA.
• Ehrman begins with certain cultural attitudes toward religion and then tries to force the N.
• Ehrman wanted people to be interested in history and I think he achieved that goal.
• For myself, I value Ehrman's insights, even though I disagree with some of his conclusions.
• Ehrman is writing about.
• Ehrman trots out some of the more well worn examples of possible discrepancies.
• But Ehrman can rely on solid arguments.
• I cite these pop writers only because Ehrman does the same, as proof for his point.
• Bock has debated agnostic biblical scholar Bart Ehrman on whether the gospels have been forged.
• That is, that the Bauer Ehrman thesis is not supported by historical or textual evidence.
• Ehrman goes after biblical literary forgery.
• TRIPLE CROSS is another well written entry in Ehrman's series.
• Ehrman's personal conclusions, and the fact that he identifies as agnostic.
• Ehrman often lapses into making arguments based on language style to make his case.
• Ehrman has a solid background and the methods used to research are excellent.
• Ehrman is doing what he says the Christians works he condemns are, except worse.
• I can understand why Ehrman would want to respond to the best material from the mythicist movement.
• I mentioned Bart Ehrman.
• Though I disagree, Ehrman doesn't go off the deep end of his scholarship.
• Ehrman's work and in so doing, proves the reliability of the Bible.
• Ehrman has documented is well known by scholars.
• I much appreciate Ehrman's perspective, as well as his scholarship.
• Again, I didnt disagree with Ehrman on everything.
• Ehrman writes well, articulates complicated matters easily, and never speaks down to his readership.
• Ehrman could well be the best known Biblical scholar today.
• Thank you for your gift of reason and truth, Professor Ehrman.
• Professor Ehrman is the best.
• Cynicism and relativism seem on display here, too, especially in Ehrman's article.
• And certainly Ehrman's personal crisis has resonated with many readers.
• Ehrman presents the research and widely accepted scholarship in an accessible, readable format.
• In the end, it is not that Ehrman cannot find answers in the bible to this quesiton.
• But rather, because God didn't meet Ehrman's own personal standards.
• Professor Ehrman's narrative is in turn humorous and serious, contemoprary and classical.
• In theory what Ehrman states could be possible, but it's still just speculation.
• Ehrman is the James A.
• Ehrman is a scholar for the people, which I appreciate.
• Ehrman's question about why there are four gospels.
• So I find the level of detail that Ehrman takes to look at each claim a bit too much.
• I therefore regard Ehrman's working assumption here as bogus.
• A skeptic who has developed quite the following in recent years is Bart Ehrman.
• Still, that is the case and many are quoting Ehrman as if he actually spoke with authority.
• Ehrman should get back to writing real story about the early church which he is excellent at.
• The core problem with Ehrman's conclusion is that it does not match the data.
• Craig also exposes the errors of the misguided and dangerous skeptical scholars like Bart Ehrman, J.
• This insight affords the opportunity for Ehrman to explain the utility of contemporary Reader.
• 1969 : Heller Ehrman attorneys take on " Parisi v . Davidson " pro bono.
• Notwithstanding Ehrman's inconsistent prattle, it is certain that Jesus Christ is God.
• Nice rebuttal to the Happy Agnostic Ehrman.
• Read Bart Ehrman.
• Anyone familiar with Dawkins, Harris, Dennett, and Ehrman will have seen it all before.
• Ehrman is very good at not being biased to one side.
• I have first heard about Bart Ehrman when I have watched Yale lectures on New Testament.
• But Ehrman does not give us this needed New Testament table.
• Ehrman's scholarship is well respected and that respect is certainly deserved.
• Throughout the first eight chapters, Perrin engages Ehrman's points in an indirect manner.
• He recounts his own spiritual journey as he dismantles the illogical theses of Ehrman.
• One who has had a New York Times best seller in this regard is Bart Ehrman.
• Ehrman was once a Christian.
• I reject Ehrman's verdict.
• Ehrman used to be a Christian, he tells us.
• Most scholars in the third quest for the historical Jesus consider the crucifixion indisputable, as do Bart Ehrman,.
• You don't need a degree in Biblical studies to understand what Ehrman has to say.
• Readers of Ehrman are struck by the personal nature of his writings.
• But there is so much more material that Ehrman's position ignores.
• Ehrman pays special attention to details that moderns have given special importance.
• I also contacted Mark Goodacre and attempted to contact Bart Ehrman and E . P . Sanders.
• This is a constant problem for Ehrman.
• After this Ehrman spends the last three chapters explaining how he sees the historical Jesus.
• I heard Ehrman on NPR, and I felt sorry for him.
• Ehrman argues Paul worshiped Jesus as an angel who became human.
• I am afraid that Ehrman is not an objective scholar.
• Chapter 7 provides a more detailed rebuttal of Ehrman's view of Paul.
• Ehrman, being familiar with his writing.
• Bart Ehrman is a competent scholar.
• There is no doubt Ehrman is knowledgable in his field.
• In particular, it focuses on the claims of Bart Ehrman and James Tabor.
• Ehrman is probably the most important modern writer about religion.
• To his credit, Ehrman sticks with his strength.
• This is underscored by Ehrman's own trek.
• I have faced JW's on the street with Ehrman's points of scholarship.
• Matthew and Paul are in agreement, and Ehrman is wrong again.
• Ehrman takes an even handed approach to discussing the true history of the early Christian Church.
• Ehrman and especially than myself have struggled with this question.
• But, instead, Ehrman has taken a different path.
• Ehrman did validated this idea, but not in the way that I expected.
• Truly, I love Bart Ehrman and am in awe of his scholarship.
• In sum, contrary to Bauer and Ehrman, orthodoxy preceded heresy.
• They were writing to the interested skeptic or Christian who liked or hated Ehrman's.
• So the recommendation to try out Mr Ehrman's first offering was a no brainer.
• The former is a discussion of problems with Ehrman's overarching categories of interpretation.
• Bart Ehrman is a very good writer.
• Ehrman in their respective colleges, and exit with total indifference to the Bible and Christianity.
• Bart Ehrman, Jesus Interrupted, is a recent and useful contriubtion as well.
• Saw Joe Ehrman and Jeffrey Marx speak recently at an event in San Diego.
• Ehrman is a great writer and his style is engaging and easy to follow.
• It is a pleasure to study the Bible through the teaching of Prof Ehrman in Jesus Interrupted.
• Al offer a fairly devastating critique of Ehrman's major premises.